What is token burning? What are the impacts and mechanisms of token burning and specific examples of projects using token burning.

Token burning is the process by which tokens or coins are permanently removed from circulation, thereby reducing their total supply. This mechanism has significant implications for the value of the assets and can be used to regulate inflation, stabilize prices, or as a tool to reward the community. In this article, we will take a detailed look at how burning works, what its advantages and disadvantages are, and in which cases blockchain projects use it.

Can only tokens or also cryptocurrencies be burned?

In the case of tokens, burning is more often implemented as part of the tokenomics (economic policy) of a particular project. Tokens are often burned using smart contracts that remove tokens from the network and thereby reduce their total supply.

In the case of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, burning also exists, but is less common. For example, Bitcoin does not have a direct burning mechanism, but transactions can result in Bitcoins being “lost” if a user decides to send coins to an address from which they cannot be recovered (such as a “non-existent address”). However, Ethereum has previously implemented a burning process as part of EIP-1559, which removes a certain number of coins from circulation with each transaction.

So, both tokens and cryptocurrencies can be burned, although the implementation and reasons may vary depending on the type and purpose of the project. You will learn more when you read the full article.

Token and Cryptocurrency Burning Mechanisms

There are several ways in which the token burning process can be implemented within blockchain networks. These mechanisms are implemented through smart contracts or protocols that automatically control how and when tokens are removed from circulation.

  1. Burn on Transaction Fees – this mechanism is most common in many projects where a portion of transaction fees is automatically burned. For example, within the Ethereum network, a portion of transaction fees (called “gas fees”) is burned, gradually reducing the total supply of ETH. This process can serve as a tool to control inflation and stabilize value.
  2. Consensus-Based Burn – some cryptocurrencies implement token burning as part of their consensus mechanism. In the case of Proof-of-Stake (PoS) or other alternative consensus algorithms, network participants can “burn” their tokens as part of the transaction validation process or to secure the network.
  3. Scheduled Burns – some projects define time intervals during which a certain amount of tokens will be burned. These burns are often announced in advance to the community, creating predictability in the long-term plans of the project. For example, projects like Binance Coin (BNB) regularly perform burns as part of their plan to reduce the total supply.
  4. Buyback and Burn – this mechanism involves the project buying back its tokens from the market and then burning them. This process is often used to reduce the supply of tokens in circulation, which can increase the value of the remaining tokens for holders.

The Impact of Token Burns and Cryptocurrencies on the Market and Economy

Token burns can have a variety of effects on the cryptocurrency market, from price volatility to long-term project valuation. Let’s take a look at some of these effects:

  1. Supply Reduction and Potential Price Increase – the main economic consequence of burning is a reduction in the total supply of tokens. In theory, if demand remains the same or increases, a reduction in supply leads to an increase in price. This effect is especially noticeable in projects that regularly burn large amounts of tokens, which can have a positive impact on the price of the asset.
  2. Protection against inflation – burning can serve as a tool to combat inflation in the event that tokens in circulation grow rapidly. As with traditional currencies, an excessive supply of tokens can weaken their value in cryptocurrencies. Burning provides a controlled way to reduce supply and maintain price stability.
  3. Trust in the project – regular burns can increase investor confidence because they demonstrate a project’s long-term commitment to its economic stability. In some cases, such as Binance Coin (BNB), token burns can serve as a marketing tool to attract new users who see the potential in the increasing value of the token.
  4. Impact on decentralization and the ecosystem – burns can also affect decentralization, especially if the process is not fully transparent or is controlled by centralized entities (e.g., a team of developers). This aspect can have a negative impact on community trust if the burn is performed for reasons that are not consistent with the philosophy of decentralization.
  5. Impact on volatility – burns can also have an impact on the volatility of cryptocurrencies. If burns are performed at unpredictable intervals or in excessive quantities, this can cause short-term price fluctuations. This effect is often observed with newer cryptocurrencies or projects with less liquidity.

More on Token Burning and Cryptocurrencies

  1. Burning as a Volatility Reduction Tool – token burning can be an effective tool for reducing volatility in some cryptocurrency markets. Regular burning can stabilize the value of a token, as limiting its supply can mitigate price fluctuations caused by random market movements. This process creates certain predictable factors that help investors and traders better understand the long-term value of a token.
  2. Focus on Long-Term Value – token burning can also be a tool for focusing on the long-term value of a project. Regularly burning tokens reduces their availability, which can increase the value of the remaining tokens in circulation. This mechanism can create a specific ecosystem where token holders can benefit from the limited supply in the long term, making the project more attractive to the investment community.
  3. Burning as part of reducing mining rewards – in some cases, token burning is used as a way to compensate for the reduction in rewards for miners. When the mining reward is reduced (such as during the Bitcoin halving), some cryptocurrencies may implement burning as a tool to balance the economic impact on miners. This step can help maintain the incentive to mine while also preventing unwanted fluctuations in the token supply.
  4. Burning vs. Staking – while staking is a way to keep tokens in circulation and support network security, token burning is the exact opposite – it is the removal of tokens from circulation. In some projects, burning can be combined with staking as a way to incentivize users. For example, some projects provide staking rewards while also burning a certain amount of tokens as part of an economic policy.

Specific examples of projects using burning

  1. Binance Coin (BNB) – is one of the most well-known examples of using token burning. Binance regularly burns BNB tokens as part of its program. Binance has committed to burning up to 100 million BNB tokens (50% of the total supply). The burn is performed every three months and is based on the volume of transactions on the Binance exchange. This process helps reduce the total supply of BNB and can support its value in the long term.
  2. Ethereum (ETH) – following the introduction of EIP-1559 in August 2021, the Ethereum blockchain began implementing a transaction fee burning mechanism. This mechanism burns a portion of the transaction fees (so-called “base fees”), thereby reducing the total supply of ETH. This move was designed to reduce ETH inflation and create a deflationary economic model. In some periods when transaction demand is high, ETH burning can even outpace the amount of new coins mined by miners.
  3. Shiba Inu (SHIB) – a popular meme cryptocurrency, has implemented token burning as part of its marketing strategy. The project regularly burns large amounts of SHIB tokens through various initiatives, such as burns tied to purchases on specific platforms or community support. In this way, it seeks to increase the value of the remaining tokens in circulation and create a sense of scarcity.
  4. Terra (LUNA) – the Terra project, which uses the UST stablecoin, has implemented LUNA token burning as part of its ecosystem. Burning is performed when new UST tokens are issued. This process is part of the stablecoin’s value stabilization mechanism and at the same time reduces the total supply of LUNA tokens. This ensures that the stability of the system is maintained, while reducing the supply of LUNA tokens can have a positive impact on its price.
  5. Ripple (XRP) – although Ripple (XRP) does not use a regular burn mechanism like other cryptocurrencies, its developers and community activities occasionally focus on burning tokens in case of unnecessary or unused tokens. This move serves to improve XRP’s position in the market and can help reduce concerns about inflationary pressures in case there are too many XRP tokens in circulation.

These examples show the diverse approaches to token burning in cryptocurrency projects. Each project has its own reason for implementing the burn, and the process can have different impacts on the value and stability of the cryptocurrencies.

For an overview of all articles, click below: